• George Cook

A Brief History of Community Banking

Way back in 1889 my family started a small, community bank in Somerset, a quaint little town tucked away in the Laurel Highlands of southwestern Pennsylvania. For some context, at that time, there were roughly 63 million people in the United States and approximately 11,000 banks to serve them. Fast forward to 2017 and our population has exploded to more than 320 million yet the number of banks has plummeted to less than 5,000 nationwide, fewer than half the number of banks we had 125 years ago!

Somerset Trust Company’s original headquarters, recently renovated by the bank which celebrated its 125th anniversary in 2014

Over the decades, the number of banks in the United States has ebbed and flowed based on the health of the economy, the regulatory landscape, and other economic factors. However, the trend since the 1980s has been as consistent as it has been dramatic – a 65% decrease in the number of banks in the U.S., the overwhelming majority of which were small, community banks.

65% Decrease

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis - https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/USNUM

The latest wave of bank consolidation has been attributed to a number of factors including stricter regulation. These changes have mostly favored large banks who have fully staffed legal departments and can afford to make wholesale changes to their underwriting operations. Many community banks have either had to sell themselves to larger regional or national banks, or go out of business entirely. While these consolidated national banks are able to more cheaply underwrite loans, we rarely discuss the costs of losing relationship banking.

Small businesses are most adversely affected by bank consolidation. Locally-owned businesses often have limited operating history and rely on the reputation of the owners and managers. Local community bankers evaluated qualitative factors, in addition to traditional quantitative methods, to judge the creditworthiness of a business. But, if lending decisions are no longer made in the community, there is no way to capture these very important qualitative details and business loan requests are, all too often, denied. To make matters worse, traditional banks frequently refuse to make loans smaller than $100,000 whereas a recent Small Business Credit Survey suggests that 70% of small businesses (with less than $1 million in revenue) wanted loans smaller than $100,000.

The growing disconnect between local, Main Street businesses and traditional banks can be disheartening. But, I’m confident that emerging players like Honeycomb will find exciting new ways to use technology to empower small businesses. Together, we can bring community banking back in a scalable way that transforms the communities we call home.

George Cook is the Co-Founder and CEO of Honeycomb. As a sixth-generation community banker, George is passionate about the positive impact that local lending can have on communities. When he’s not trying to fix the U.S. financial services system, George can be found exploring the wonderful neighborhoods and small businesses of Pittsburgh with his wife, Elizabeth.






#CommunityBanking #SmallBusinessLending

Join our newsletter

Be the first to find out about new Honeycomb campaigns and local businesses to support.


  • Honeycomb Credit Facebook
  • Honeycomb Credit Instagram
  • Honeycomb Credit LinkedIn
  • Honeycomb Credit Twitter

Business Owners




Securities offered through Honeycomb Portal LLC or Honeycomb SMB LLC have not been recommended or approved by any federal or state securities commission or regulatory authority. Honeycomb does not provide any investment advice or recommendation, and does not provide any legal or tax advice with respect to any securities. All securities listed on this site are being offered by, and all information included on this site is the responsibility of, the applicable issuer of such securities. In making an investment decision, investors must rely on their own examination of the issuer and the terms of the offering, including the merits and risks involved. Securities sold under Title III are speculative, illiquid, and investors can lose all of their money.